Posts

Showing posts from September 15, 2021

Britannia l Marie Gold My Startup Season 3.0: democratizing entrepreneurship for India’s Homemakers.

September 15, 2021

democratizing entrepreneurship for India’s Homemakers. Participants to benefit from Google’s digital skilling resources Launches the Indian Homemakers’ Entrepreneurship Report 2021 - A nationwide survey amongst homemakers to study barriers, triggers, and enablers to embracing entrepreneurship o 62% of homemakers aspire to start up a business of their own. 53% of homemakers say contributing to the family financially is one of the primary drivers to start up o 73% cite lack of time from home responsibilities, 53% cite lack of guidance & 50% cite insufficient funds as the main barriers that prevent women from starting up o 77% of homemakers who desire to start up claim technology can aid them in this journey – as it can enhance their knowledge & know-how of how to run a business ● The program to provide INR 10,00,000 to 10 selected homemakers to start off on their entrepreneurial journeys ● All participants to be provided free acce

women in india

India, with a population of 989 million, is the world's second most populous country. Of that number, 120 million are women who live in poverty.

India has 16 percent of the world's population, but only 2.4 percent of its land, resulting in great pressures on its natural resources.

Over 70 percent of India's population currently derive their livelihood from land resources, which includes 84 percent of the economically-active women.

India is one of the few countries where males significantly outnumber females, and this imbalance has increased over time. India's maternal mortality rates in rural areas are among the world's highest. From a global perspective, Indian accounts for 19 percent of all lives births and 27 percent of all maternal deaths.

"There seems to be a consensus that higher female mortality between ages one and five and high maternal mortality rates result in a deficit of females in the population. Chatterjee (1990) estimates that deaths of young girls in India exceed those of young boys by over 300,000 each year, and every sixth infant death is specifically due to gender discrimination." Of the 15 million baby girls born in India each year, nearly 25 percent will not live to see their 15th birthday.

"Although India was the first country to announce an official family planning program in 1952, its population grew from 361 million in 1951 to 844 million in 1991. India's total fertility rate of 3.8 births per woman can be considered moderate by world standards, but the sheer magnitude of population increase has resulted in such a feeling of urgency that containment of population growth is listed as one of the six most important objectives in the Eighth Five-Year Plan."

Since 1970, the use of modern contraceptive methods has risen from 10 percent to 40 percent, with great variance between northern and southern India. The most striking aspect of contraceptive use in India is the predominance of sterilization, which accounts for more than 85 percent of total modern contraception use, with female sterilization accounting for 90 percent of all sterilizations.

The Indian constitution grants women equal rights with men, but strong patriarchal traditions persist, with women's lives shaped by customs that are centuries old. In most Indian families, a daughter is viewed as a liability, and she is conditioned to believe that she is inferior and subordinate to men. Sons are idolized and celebrated. May you be the mother of a hundred sons is a common Hindu wedding blessing.

The origin of the Indian idea of appropriate female behavior can be traced to the rules laid down by Manu in 200 B.C.: "by a young girl, by a young woman, or even by an aged one, nothing must be done independently, even in her own house". "In childhood a female must be subject to her father, in youth to her husband, when her lord is dead to her sons; a woman must never be independent."

Women Are Malnourished

The exceptionally high rates of malnutrition in South Asia are rooted deeply in the soil of inequality between men and women.

"...the poor care that is afforded to girls and women by their husbands and by elders is the first major reason for levels of child malnutrition that are markedly higher in South Asia than anywhere else in the world."

This point is made in the article, The Asian Enigma, published by Unicef in the 1996 Progress of Nations, in which the rates of childhood malnutrition in South Asia are compared with those in Africa. We learn that malnutrition is far worse in South Asia, directly due to the fact that women in South Asia have less voice and freedom of movement than in Africa. "Judgement and self-expression and independence largely denied, millions of women in South Asia have neither the knowledge nor the means nor the freedom to act in their own and their children's best interests."

"Gender disparities in nutrition are evident from infancy to adulthood. In fact, gender has been the most statistically significant determinant of malnutrition among young children and malnutrition is a frequent direct or underlying cause of death among girls below age 5. Girls are breast-fed less frequently and for shorter durations in infancy; in childhood and adulthood, males are fed first and better. Adult women consume approximately 1,000 fewer calories per day than men according to one estimate from Punjab. Comparison of household dietary intake studies in different parts of the country shows that nutritional equity between males and females is lower in northern than in southern states."

Nutritional deprivation has two major consequences for women: they never reach their full growth potential and anaemia. Both are risk factors in pregnancy, with anaemia ranging from 40-50 percent in urban areas to 50-70 percent in rural areas. This condition complicates childbearing and result in maternal and infant deaths, and low birth weight infants.

One study found anaemia in over 95 percent of girls ages 6-14 in Calcutta, around 67 percent in the Hyderabad area, 73 percent in the New Delhi area, and about 18 percent in the Madras area. This study states, "The prevalence of anaemia among women ages 15-24 and 25-44 years follows similar patterns and levels. Besides posing risks during pregnancy, anaemia increases women's susceptibility to diseases such as tuberculosis and reduces the energy women have available for daily activities such as household chores, child care, and agricultural labor. Any severely anaemic individual is taxed by most physical activities, including walking at an ordinary pace.

Women Are in Poor Health

Surviving through a normal life cycle is a resource-poor woman's greatest challenge.

"The practice of breast-feeding female children for shorter periods of time reflects the strong desire for sons. If women are particularly anxious to have a male child, they may deliberately try to become pregnant again as soon as possible after a female is born. Conversely, women may consciously seek to avoid another pregnancy after the birth of a male child in order to give maximum attention to the new son."

A primary way that parents discriminate against their girl children is through neglect during illness. When sick, little girls are not taken to the doctor as frequently as are their brothers. A study in Punjab shows that medical expenditures for boys are 2.3 times higher than for girls.

As adults, women get less health care than men. They tend to be less likely to admit that they are sick and they'll wait until their sickness has progressed before they seek help or help is sought for them. Studies on attendance at rural primary health centers reveal that more males than females are treated in almost all parts of the country, with differences greater in northern hospitals than southern ones, pointing to regional differences in the value placed on women. Women's socialization to tolerate suffering and their reluctance to be examined by male personnel are additional coMaternal Mortality

India's maternal mortality rates in rural areas are among the highest in the world.

A factor that contributes to India's high maternal mortality rate is the reluctance to seek medical care for pregnancy - it is viewed as a temporary condition that will disappear. The estimates nationwide are that only 40-50 percent of women receive any antenatal care. Evidence from the states of Bihar, Rajasthan, Orissa, Uttar Pradesh, Maharashtra and Gujarat find registration for maternal and child health services to be as low as 5-22 percent in rural areas and 21-51 percent in urban areas.

Even a woman who has had difficulties with previous pregnancies is usually treated with home remedies only for three reasons: the decision that a pregnant woman seek help rests with the mother-in-law and husband; financial considerations; and fear that the treatment may be more harmful than the malady.

It is estimated that pregnancy-related deaths account for one-quarter of all fatalities among women aged 15 to 29, with well over two-thirds of them considered preventable. For every maternal death in India, an estimated 20 more women suffer from impaired health. One village-level study of rural women in Maharashtra determined on the basis of physical examinations that some 92 percent suffered from one or more gynecological disorder.

Women's health is harmed by lack of access to and the poor quality of reproductive services.

"About 24.6 million couples, representing roughly 18 percent of all married women, want no more children but are not using contraception. (Operations Research Group, 1990). The causes of this unmet need remain poorly understood, but a qualitative study in Tamil Nadu suggests that women's lack of decision-making power in the family, opportunity costs involved in seeking contraception, fear of child death, and poor quality of contraceptive service all play an important role." (Ravindran 1993).

Some estimates suggest that some 5 million abortions are performed annually in India, with the large majority being illegal. As a result, abortion-related mortality is high. Although abortion has been legal since 1972 in India, "studies suggest that although official policy seeks to make pregnancy-termination services widely available, in practice guidelines on abortion limit access to services, particularly in rural areas. In 1981, of the 6,200 physicians trained to perform abortions, only 1,600 were working in rural areas."

Women's health is further harmed by air and water pollution and lack of sanitation.

The impact of pollution and industrial wastes on health is considerable. In Environment, Development and the Gender Gap, Sandhya Venkateswaran asserts that "the high incidence of malnutrition present amongst women and their low metabolism and other health problems affect their capacity to deal with chemical stress. The smoke from household biomass (made up of wood, dung and crop residues) stoves within a three-hour period is equivalent to smoking 20 packs of cigarettes. For women who spend at least three hours per day cooking, often in a poorly ventilated area, the impact includes eye problems, respiratory problems, chronic bronchitis and lung cancer. One study quoted by WHO in 1991 found that pregnant women cooking over open biomass stoves had almost a 50 percent higher chance of stillbirth.

Anaemia makes a person more susceptible to carbon monoxide toxicity, which is one of the main pollutants in the biomass smoke. Given the number of Indian women who are anaemic - 25 to 30 percent in the reproductive age group and almost 50 percent in the third trimester - this adds to their vulnerability to carbon monoxide toxicity.

Additionally, with an increasing population, diseases caused by waste disposal, such as hookworm, are rampant. People who work barefooted are particularly susceptible, and it has been found that hookworm is directly responsible for the high percentage of anaemia among rural women.

If you can't feed a hundred people, then feed just one."
"Never worry about numbers. Help one person at a time, and always start with the person nearest you." -- Mother Teresa

Lessons from DWCRA (Andhra Pradesh)
Article By Velavartipati Vachaspati.
M.A (Political Science) M.A (Anthropology) NET (Anthropology)

The empowerment of women became necessary as they are almost fifty percent of the population and are being discriminated at all fronts. The moral inferiority of Indians, especially Hindus, was supposed to be demonstrated by the barbaric practices followed against women. Writing in the nineteenth century, John Stuart Mill considered Hindu civilization crude and immoral. Thus colonial historians justified the British rule in India by arguing that Hindu women received the protection and intervention of the colonial rule, as at that time the practice ‘sati’ was widely practiced. Even from the Brahmanical sources, there sufficient evidence to show that the structure of institutions that ensured the subordination of women was complete long before Muslims as a religious community had even come into being. As for property is concerned, women not only did not own property, they were considered to be property or commodity, the bride, for example, being gifted to groom along with other goods. The for present days problems like bride burning, domestic violence, suicides of wives, daughters and sisters, the origins were laid by our ancestors out of ignorance. Hence, the solution lies in empowering women to eliminate the Economic Inequalities, Social Inequalities, Physical Inequalities, and Political Inequalities. Economic Inequalities of women may be in terms of inheritance of property, salary, contribution to the maintenance of the family etc. women have no right to inherit the property on equal basis on par with her brothers as per Dharma Sastras. This social deformity resulted in the raise of Dowry System in the Hindu Society. Social Inequality means inequality in terms of literacy, education in which women are not on par with men. As per Census 2001, the female literacy is 54.16 per cent compared to the male literacy of 75.6 per cent. These statistics speaks volumes out Census. This was due to discouragement of female education by men, who may be brothers, fathers and others, or as a whole. On levels of education too, a women from her childhood, who is eager to study has to overcome ‘n’ number of obstacles, which may be social, cultural and biological. In India, female entrance into colleges is mere 35.5 per cent, and the percentage of female entrance into post graduation and in other higher studies is dismal. Even though she completed her education, her decision to do the job or a particular job depends at the mercy of the male members of the family, as they suddenly attain the feudal face and the women’s decision would be turned down by a single stroke of word. The political inequality is at high degree, which is visible to the naked eye, and can be seen by observing the number of women representatives in the legislatures. Women have been politically marginalized in our country and most of them live extremely restricted lives. They are not allowed to have much of a voice even within their community or family’s decision-making processes, live alone a meaningful say in the national politics. Not just politicians but also even many intellectuals are angrily rejecting the idea of reservations for women and calling it a retrogressive move even in societies where women exercise relatively more freedom in day-to-day living, they remain politically marginalized. Women have done extremely well in the Scandinavian countries, Sweden (34 M.Ps), Norway (39 Maps), Denmark, Finland, where they are moving in the direction of near equal participation. In these societies, women have begun to seriously alter the very nature of politics and have made enduring and substantial gains for themselves in every field. In India, the problem is more serious because while women are inching forward bit by bit, in India the participation of women in politics is actually declining. In the 1996 elections they are 6.4 percent of 543 seats in the Parliament, in 1999 elections they are 6.5 per cent. In the State’s legislatures, the representation of women shows the contradictory features as they do not show the relationship between the rate of literacy of women and their participation in politics. A comparison between the status of Kerala and Rajasthan, whose literacy rates are at the opposite ends of the spectrum. In Kerala, the overall literacy rate is reportedly 90 per cent with 80 percent female literacy. By contrast, in Rajasthan, the female literacy is mere 20 percent and only 12 of the females are literate in rural areas. Kerala has a matrimonial tradition in which women have a much larger measure of autonomy and freedom of movement while most of the women in Rajasthan live far more lives that are restricted in aggressively patriarchal communities. However, not all the cultural and educational advantages of women in Kerala have translated into higher political participation. The percentage of women in Kerala legislative assembly rose from less than one percent in 1967 to six per cent in 1991. In Rajasthan, the representation of women was four percent in 1967 and reached eight percent in 1986-90. By contrast, U.P, Bihar and Madhya Pradesh, which are known for their low educational levels and repressive cultural norms for women, have not only sent a relatively larger portion of women to the Lok Sabha but have also elected relatively more women MLAs. This is a huge disproportionate of representation in the Legislatures from statistics of literacy. Physical inequality is another form, which is the hallmark of patriarchy and causing the physical elimination of girl child. The character of Indian Society and culture, satirically saying, which is hailed as great, may be known by observing the fluctuating sex ratio against women; here sex ratio means the number of women per thousand men. In year 1901, it was 972, in 1921, it was 955, in 1931, it was 950, in 1941, it was 945, in 1951, it was 946, in 1961, it was 941, in 1971-it was930, in 1981, it was 935, in 1991, it was 929, and in 2001, it was 934. As per Census 2001, though the sex ratio has increased from 929 in 1991 to 933 in 2001, still against women, where as in developed countries there are 1060 female for 1000 male, as in those countries the life expectancy of women is generally longer than men due to the availability of health facilities. Moreover, according to the recent census the decrease in sex ratio in the age group of 0-6 is alarming.

The general tendency of life expectancy of women is higher, is common to all over the world, but the sex ratio in India is against women. It is because the practice of female infanticide, particularly in urban areas likes Bombay, New Delhi, Hyderabad, Madras etc. The middle class families in particular are the main perpetrators of this practice due to economic reasons as bearing a girl child is uneconomical to them and the parents think the expenditure spent on her is lost forever, and another cause is the preference of the male child. In fact, women live longer, if they are allowed to live. In spite of having higher life expectancy, the number of women is low as indicated by the fluctuating sex ratios, which are against women. It is more serious in Haryana and Punjab where the sex ratio is seriously against women. The girl child has to encounter the first attempt before her birth. The medical test, amniocentesis, which is meant to test the health of the foetus, is being used to test the sex of the foetus. If the foetus is female, then there will be termination of the pregnancy. Here this termination issue is also decided not by that pregnant mother, but by her husband or in-laws. Hence, the saga of sorrows starts right from the womb. The girl child not only eliminated before birth, but also, if survived, sold to others by the parents due to poverty, as some tribal societies are presently doing, or neglected nutritionally during the growing period, which ultimately may result in maternal deaths, or subjected to burning for want of dowry, or often commit suicides. Even though, if she overcomes all these obstacles, then there is the threat of rapes and kidnaps in this so-called great Indian civilized society. More than 11000 rapes, more than 12000 kidnappings per year are reported in India. Ironically, age of victim may very from three year to 80 year old and the age of rapist could be from student to eighty-year-old man. Most of the atrocities against the girl child are unreported to the police officials due to fear of humiliation. In India, every one of three married women is subjected to atrocities like beating, burning, withdrawal, sexual harassment etc. The life of women particularly when she attained the age of marriage is miserable. She bound to face the several comments from street side Romeos and those Romeos may be a teenager or middle-aged man or ‘elderly’ like man. Women instead of protest became habituated to this kind of social harassment. Even in settling her marriage, her opinion is often overlooked or may consider not necessary by the family members, particularly by the male members what is the basic violation of Human Rights, and is an offence under Civil Procedure Code and Criminal Procedure Code. Some girls are made to get married even before the constitutionally prescribed age, 18. All these offences against women suggest the character of Indian society is not at all civilized and treats women as second-class or marginalized citizen; leave along the Right to dignity, their physical survival is in question. The Indian Society shows the unique distinction that whatever is the religion, caste, class or creed, it treats women alike, and commits atrocities against women alike with the similar intentions, and all the men treat women alike. Hence, it is a unique way of showing the Unity in Diversity. The exceptional qualities of Ms.Jayalalithaa like Intelligence, Mental Toughness, Making critics silent seldom expressed by the Indian women, though they posses those qualities. At the same time, women prime minister and the Chief Ministers failed to instil the sense of confidence among Indian women. They were just after election mockery and political manipulations. It is N.T.R that gave the Equal Property Inheritance to women, not Indira Gandhi or not any other women leader. Women do not inherit equal property except Andhra Pradesh, Maharashtra and Tamil Nadu. Because of this throughout the life, they tend to depend for their survival on their father before their marriage, husband after the marriage, sons after the death of her husband. Hence, the autonomy in decision-making is out of question, as she bound to obey whatever her patron orders. If she has any source of income she could definitely influence the decisions of the male members of her family. The women do not posses even the right on her sexuality, whether to have children or not to have children, is not within the rights of women. Her choice on her reproductive rights is almost ‘ZERO’, as she has been dependent on somebody. Hence, she is giving births to cricket teams or football team numbered children throughout her life beyond her biological capacity. Hence, there is population explosion in India as we crossed one billion mark recently. One day her body may take rest permanently after prolonged number of deliveries.

The socio-cultural causes are evolutionary in nature and with the help of religion, men were successful to made women as animate objects. Our great culture discriminates women as our religious texts, which laid foundations basing on hierarchy. Our Great Dharmasastras are against women and equated them with cattle. Particularly, the Manu allowed the husband to beat his wife with the stick if she questioned his orders. Manu even denied education and property rights to women, disallowed remarriage for a widow, and codified the methodology of subjugating the women and this methodology is being indoctrinated generation after generation. Her objections raised out of compulsion are often ignored. Even the 11th century Bhakti saints also equated women with cattle and allowed the husband to beat his wife with stick if she disobeyed his orders. Hence, women are denied of qualitative life under this perfectly framed culture in which they made handicap purposefully and culturally. In this culture, whatever women got from men are gifts only, not their dues. One wonder is this indoctrination has entered up to DNA level! The women born and brought-up in this culture are becoming women patriarchs due to prolonged indoctrination of patriarchal prejudices. The mother, who is women patriarch, purposefully appears herself before her daughters as a model to show that how the women should be. Hence, the vicious circle or fatal triangle ‘Patriarchy-Men-Oppression’ goes on and atrocities against women continue unabated and unstopped. Some mothers who are strict women patriarchs, do not allow their daughters even to laugh, to sit before books even for an hour, believing that girl child should learn to do domestic work first. This is resulting in ignorance of the girl child about the worldly affairs, day-to-day happenings, and changing patterns of the society. Hence, the girl after getting married under patriarchal set up, when enter her family of procreation, need to live with her husband who is aware of worldly affairs, day-to-day happenings, and changing patterns of the society, the girl faces the problems of adjustment within this new environment, which is different from her family of orientation. If her husband is compassionate, then it is well and good. If he is bad person, then the girl, who is ignorant of worldly affairs, day-to-day happenings, and changing patterns of the society, undergoes frustration result in maladjustment, ultimately leads to domestic violence. Even a women who had higher education often get ill-treated or cheated at the husband or in the society, as she has brought up in the patriarchal system, which is undemocratic. Hence, the generations of girls tend to grow in ignorance with indifference to worldly affairs, day-to-day happenings, and changing patterns of the society, their rights and their abilities, hence suffer.

Empowerment of Women started from the South in India that too rigorously from Andhra Pradesh. The women prime minister and the women chief ministers failed to instill any kind of the sense of confidence among women in India. Here the policies matter not personalities. A change, which is radical, has taken place in the family life of the women of rural Andhra Pradesh because of the scheme of DWCRA, which empowered them. The total population of Andhra Pradesh as at 00:00 hrs of 1 March 2001 stood at 75,727,541 as per Provincial Census of India, 2001. Andhra Pradesh occupies the fifth place in population as against the fourth in the previous Census of India. During 1981-1991, this state witnessed an increase of 24.20 per cent in population, which came down to 13.86 per cent during 1991-2001 while the country’s decadal growth rate is 21.34 per cent. This achievement of Andhra Pradesh is spectacular. Andhra Pradesh has shown the sharpest decline in population growth rate among all the states (10.34 per cent). The average annual exponential growth rate has declined to 1.93 per cent in 1991-2001 from 2.14 per cent in 1981-1991. It is can be a hypothesis that it happened because of Empowerment of Women in Andhra Pradesh through DWCRA.

Presently, 4, 20,000 DWCRA groups are working only in Andhra Pradesh that is major portion of total DWCRA groups in India. The main highlights of the DWCRA are the women members of DWCRA form a group of 10 to 15 women at the village level for delivery of services like credit and skill training, cash and infrastructure support for self-employment. Women save one Rupee a day and after watching the performance of a group over nine to twelve months, that group is given a one time grant of Rs.25,000 /- as a Revolving Fund (shared by Central and State Governments in 50:50 ratio) towards infrastructure, purchase of raw materials, marketing, child care and so on. The DWCRA groups formed in Andhra Pradesh cover more than 2 million women and their savings have crossed Rs.15 million so far. It is assumed that the DWCRA has created a sense of confidence among the women of rural Andhra Pradesh and they are moving towards autonomy in decision-making at all fronts which reflected in the reduction of population growth rate in the State. The State of Andhra Pradesh has every right to claim the credits of the statistics of Census of India, 2001 for its performance regarding the population control as it is in the forefront of empowering women in the state by means of DWCRA. The ignorance of DWCRA women in utilizing their saved money to be checked by providing adequate guidance. What will happen, if these DWCRA women started asserting their voting power? The political equations will tilt. What will happen, if these women threaten the all the governments …not to vote if govt., has not given the reservations in the legislatures? These women can even demand legislation in the parliament for inheritance of Equal Property. But somebody should educate them in this direction. And they will ultimately give a final blow to the male domination in the parliament and politics. Yes, it is this DWCRA woman that can initiate a change in this direction in India.

Wherever Women Succeeded If We Look around the world, we find that women have secured a strong Economic, Socio-Cultural and Political Footholds only in those countries or societies where institutions function according to well-defined democratic norms, where the crime, violence in general, women in particular, where over all corruption levels and population growth rate is low to very low, where decision-making is not concentrated in the hands of few, where citizens actively participate in local self government, and the voice of women is listen and respected may be from the family level to the national level. In these countries, where women have begun to seriously alter the very nature of politics and have made enduring and substantial gains from themselves in every field. This situation can be witnessed in the Scandinavian countries like Sweden, Norway, Denmark and Finland, where they are moving in the direction of near equal participation at all fronts. But in India, women are treated as second class citizens, as politicians are thinking of providing reservations to women in the legislature, but failing to come to consensus. This is a paradox in democracies. There are several socio-cultural, economic and political factors for this second class status of the Indian women. They are second class citizens in the sense they do not have autonomy in the decision making process, leave alone at political level, not even in their family particularly on their reproductive rights. Even after witnessing a women Prime Minister, women Chief Ministers and women dignitaries, the Indian women failed to get the moral boost, and remained indifferent to their reproductive rights. Hence, Indian population crossed the One Billion mark, though India initiated the Family Planning Programme way back in 1951. What remain constant are the low economic, social, cultural and political values accorded to the work performed primarily by the women in the conditions of exploitation, no job security, and violations of Human Rights against them, which reflected in the growth of the population. Of late, it is identified that the Empowerment of Women is necessary to check the population growth for sustainable development. Many schemes launched by the both Government of India and State governments failed to attract the attention of Indian women, resulted in partial success only, and failed to imbibe the sense of confidence among women, except the Central Government’s scheme, DWCRA( Development of Women and Children in Rural Areas), in Andhra Pradesh. In Andhra Pradesh, the factors that are responsible for the sharpest decline of population growth rate are little investigated during post-DWCRA period. Hence it is necessary and relevant to study the success stories and social, cultural, economic and political factors involved in the overall perspective of Improving the Quality of the Life in the New Development Perspectives in a Globalizing World.

News India

NEWS INDIA

Posts

Britannia l Marie Gold My Startup Season 3.0: democratizing entrepreneurship for India’s Homemakers.